How to improve the public school experience from an unschooler’s perspective

redefining education logo

by Mary

As an unschooling parent, I often struggle with thoughts of what happens to all the other children that are still in the public school system. While we believe very strongly in the benefits of having our children at home and following an unschooling lifestyle, I know that it is simply not possible for everyone. What can be done to help those children?

How can we care so much about our children while knowingly walking away from the other kids that are stuck in what I feel is a completely inefficient model for gaining knowledge? We can’t completely ignore these challenges. While I am not there in the U.S. to personally advocate changes, I can offer up some tips to help bring some homeschooling philosophies of learning to the classroom.

It will require an open mind and a willingness to try something new, but I believe these ideas could revolutionize the way our public education system functions. It will seem idealistic to some, but isn’t that what we need? Our children deserve new ideas to help guide them into the quickly changing future. Our school systems are deeply rooted in an archaic mindset and it is vital that we change that sooner rather than later.

I started to think of what an ideal school setting would look like to me, as an unschooler. If we look at the ways in which home educators teach, there are many components that can be introduced on a larger scale and used in schools now. In my opinion, these things could make our children successful on a whole new level. Happiness, confidence, and seeking out their own passions can take precedence even on a large scale.

The following ideas are how I think that can be achieved.

5 Ideas from Unschooling to Help Public Education

1) Change the way we view educating children

“The secret of education is respecting the pupil.” Ralph Waldo Emerson

kid in bucketFirst and foremost, we need to begin by looking at all children as individuals and make sure that they know it is okay to be exactly who they are. Acceptance by others is one of the easiest ways we can instill a positive sense of self esteem.  One of our biggest problems with a mass education system is that children are judged on one path and one centrally-dictated curriculum. They are also constantly compared to peers and encouraged to do things no matter what their ideas of happiness or success are.

Throw away the list of arbitrary rules that make children feel mistrusted right out of the gate.  Children need to feel like they are being guided, not controlled. Allow them the freedom to make choices individually about what they would like to do for at least part of the day, and then respect and encourage those choices.  By showing children respect, we will gain it too — as well as boosting their self esteem and allowing them to pursue subjects of their passion.  This can be done by simply allowing them choice and encouragement!  This concept is already proving successful in some Montessori schools.

Many children dislike school yet they spend a huge percentage of their lives within those walls.  By treating children as equals rather than subordinates that need to be controlled, it’s my opinion that they will enjoy their childhood and find excitement in learning.

2) Apprenticeships

Most people learn best by doing. As soon as kids are 12 or so, I think it would be a great idea to offer different internships in the fields that cannot be covered in the classroom. Get children out in the community learning from everyone around them. Let children follow their passion and see how far they can take it.

Very little about being confined in school resembles the “real world”. Why not get children out in it as soon as possible?

Mechanics, plumbers, electricians, contractors, computer programmers, and even artists are all people that have a wealth of knowledge to offer, yet it seems as though what they do or what they have to offer counts for very little.

Many high schools in Northern Europe use apprenticeships as part of their standard curriculum.  Most students graduate and go right into a career already trained.  While others may only need another year or two of university to build on their specialty.  The whole system is less costly and more effective to educating young people for what profession they desire.

3) Accept that learning takes place all the time and in many ways

“Knowledge which is acquired under compulsion has no hold on the mind. Therefore, do not use compulsion, but let early education be rather a sort of amusement, this will better enable you to find out the natural bent of the child.” – Plato

playing on beachWhatever a child shows interest in is important, period.  Let their creativity shine through in what ever way speaks to them.

Offer as many possibilities in a day as possible, but never force anyone to partake. No real passion is born out of coercion.

Passion is something we should be building up in children, that is how we will end up with happy adults that follow their dreams.

4) Show them the possibilities in the world, not just the path that most take.

The hardest part is for adults (especially teachers and parents) to let go of what we have been taught is important.  Useless facts, dates memorized, etc are all wonderful if pertinent to your life, but when it is not it very rarely stays with us anyhow.

We need to show our kids that what they love has value, whether that is playing video games, learning about animals, or reading Shakespeare.  It all holds value and they ARE learning all the time.

Disclaimer:  Even most unschoolers feel that reading and basic math are important, as they are the basic tools that help us learn on our own.  However, even these can be taught in creative ways that tickle the passions of the student.  For instance, math concepts can be taught playing card games or calculating outcomes of reward system, and reading can be taught using only material the student wants to learn about.

5) Open the system up for competition

 

Class size is perhaps the biggest challenge to implementing some of the other changes suggested here.  Of course, homeschoolers are usually in a one-on-one situation which is obviously not achievable in public education. However, nearly everyone in education would agree that smaller class sizes are more beneficial to the students.  The question becomes how best to achieve this goal?

For years the debate has been about money.  Special interests on all sides say more money is needed to achieve this goal. Yet, America already spends far more per student than any other developed nation — with rather unimpressive results I might add. The U.S. government currently spends over $10K per year to  educate each student. Sure, more money might be helpful to achieve this goal if spent properly. However, trusting that will happen with all of the special interests and bureaucracies seeking their cut is highly unlikely.

In my opinion, the only way to reduce class sizes in public schools is to open them to competition.  In other words, open public funding to private schools to compete with public schools.  Drop the centrally-dictated curriculum or board-certified teachers requirements for these private schools to receive funds and let the free market determine who’s most effective at educating our children.  Naturally, parents want the best for their children and will choose a school that gains a reputation for success — however it is defined by the parent.  Whether the school is geared toward apprenticeships, learning foreign languages, the arts, meditation, or sports shouldn’t matter in regards to how funds are distributed.  Again, it’s more about choice.

We don’t need to look any farther than Canada to find an example of how this could work.  In Calgary, students can choose between public schools, Montessori, Catholic schools, and a host of other private schools.  Each of these schools receives funding per student as if they’re a public school.  However, each is still strictly regulated by curriculum and teacher certifications.  I say shave those regulations back even further and let parents decide what’s important in a school.

6) Utilize technology

“If the schooling system does not rapidly close the gap between what it does, and what it should do in response to the demands of the 21st century, it will simply become irrelevant.” David Hood

I know that many schools and individual teachers are starting to see the importance of this but I think it needs to be happening at an even faster pace. The world is different decade to decade and we need to help keep our children on track.  I would argue that teaching and utilizing technology effectively in education may be one of the most important things to helping prepare our children.

Many jobs that are now supporting families did not even exist five years ago.  Personally, our family’s travel lifestyle is only possible because of the Internet and this technology.  Keeping that knowledge from children or making them feel that it is a less valuable way to spend their time seems completely outrageous to me.  They need to learn it in order to be able to make educated choices about their own future.

Tablets like iPads are just the latest gadgets that parents are told can be damaging to our children, but I wholeheartedly disagree.  Young boys and girls need to know how to function on these tablets in order to open up all possibilities to them in the future.  It’s far more beneficial than spending countless hours practicing penmanship which still goes on in schools.

Besides the operation knowledge of this technology, the educational applications are endless and the Kindle app holds thousands of backpacks’ worth of books.

Finally, with these handheld devices, students literally have access to all of the world’s knowledge in the palm of their hand.

The ramifications of that ability on our current brick-and-mortar educational paradigm are almost too many to list.  I do not expect that my unschooled kids spend the entire day on the internet, but allowing children to play games and learn in unconventional ways online will allow them to discover technology first hand and learn how to harness it.

5 things to take out of schools

1) Separation of children by age

The practice of separating children by age only fosters the idea that we cannot work with others that are different.  This couldn’t be farther from the truth.  Not only is working with different ages good for development but it also keeps in mind the highly variable rates at which young children develop. Not all five-year-olds are on the same level. Why not offer them the opportunity to learn from older children or to help younger ones?

Having a wide range of ages in a classroom will do a couple things. For starters, young children seem to benefit greatly by learning from older children, as they love to emulate older siblings and peers. Older children gain a confidence and pride in helping others and learn to be more tolerant and considerate of others when they are helping younger children.  It benefits everyone and can easily be arranged.

Mentorship programs are wonderful and they work well. But why not offer that same type of interaction in school?  Institute an age range of possibly 3-4 grade levels together at least for certain subjects and activities.  Play with it and see what best works for the students.  Montessori schools are already doing this and it works well to foster creativity and self-esteem.

These are two things that seem to be falling by the wayside in our school system at the moment.

2) Testing

 

“When test scores go up, we should worry, because of how poor a measure they are of what matters, and what you typically sacrifice in a desperate effort to raise scores.” Alfie Kohn

Testing our children is sold to us under the auspices of accountability. How on earth will we know what our children know and if the teachers are doing their job without the tests, they tell us. Accountability should come from parents and children’s happiness.

Not every one will be pleased, but if the overall sentiment is positive and the children enjoy their days, that should be enough.

Again, if parents had choices, they could simply choose a school that emphasizes testing or one that does not.

Universal testing of children is no longer an accurate measure of ability.  Book smarts and ability are not universal.

Additionally, many teachers complain that they are losing any autonomy they once had in the classroom in an effort to teach to the tests.  The quality and flexibility of education drops as the focus is solely put on what the test makers think is important. [Can I just say AMEN? - Nancy]

Meanwhile, kids are having creativity and diversity sucked out of their lives.  Finally, every answer to the questions on these so-called tests could be found or calculated with a tablet in seconds.  So, really, what’s the point?

3) Busy work

dylan cowboyBusy work is a huge component of homework and the need for children to be in school so many hours a day. Relaxation or free time is not appreciated at all yet we all need it.  Playing games and interacting with parents and siblings is a far more useful way for children to spend their time.  If they are done with their work in the classroom, allow and encourage them to do what they want.  They will still be busy, but busy working on what has value to them.  Isn’t that important enough?  Even forcing them into full-time extracurricular activities can be harmful.

In my opinion, homework should be done away with altogether (I can hear all the children cheering now.)  When a second-grader is in school all day, five days a week, why on earth do they need to do more school work?  It’s madness! Mindless worksheets just to have the appearance that they are always working or always learning.  I have news for you, they are always learning and usually most effectively through play.  Get rid of homework all together, and allow children time to be with friends and family, play, and view the world on their own terms.

4) Long hours away from home

“We ask children to do for most of the day what few adults are able to do for even an hour. How many of us, attending, say, a lecture that doesn’t interest us, can keep our minds from wandering? Hardly any.” John Holt

Simply put, our children are overworked and separated for far too many hours from their family. Family ties are extremely important for child development, especially when children are young. Interaction with their siblings, parents, extended family and pets is vital to their formation of identity.  At this point, we see our children for a very limited time during the day, and that time gets quickly eaten up with duties like extracurricular activities, homework, baths, dinner, and sleep.

Cut back the hours that they are in the classroom spent on traditional means of educating.  If we have smaller class sizes, 4 hours a day should be plenty to gain what currently is achieved in 7 or so.  If parents struggle with work commitments, then use that other time to allow children creative outlets to explore their world.  Plant gardens, allow computer time, set up apprenticeships for older children, etc.  Let children decide what they want to do and get them involved in it.

5) Institutional feel of classrooms

“If you wanted to create an education environment that was directly opposed to what the brain was good at doing, you would probably design something like a classroom.” John Medina

Schools and classrooms are overly institutional feeling, which is cold and unhealthy.  The oppressive rules are increasingly prison-like. This stifles creativity and curiosity and makes our children accept the life of living in a box.  I know building all new schools is not possible, but bringing the outdoors inside, allowing classroom time to be outdoors, colorfully painting and encouraging ideas from children are all things that can be done to help this.

When a new school is being built consider what would foster your own creativity, what would help allow you to see the world and all it’s possibilities.  Isn’t that the best we can give to our children?

The bottom line is that no matter what you think of homeschooling or unschooling, the public education system needs a massive paradigm shift. How can it hurt to incorporate new ideas into the classroom? I know many of you reading will probably question how to fund these changes.  But again I would argue that it may not be about increasing funding but rather a simple change in how and what we are funding.

“You may say I am a dreamer, but I’m not the only one.”  — John Lennon.  I know there are more people out there that see the pitfalls in the way our children are being educated.

Let’s stand up together and make a change!

Mary has been an home/un-schooling mom for the past 8 years.  You can read about her journey from school  to unschooling here.  She and her husband are now almost 2000 days into a trip around the world where her children learn everyday from the world around them, to be global citizens, and to see the value in learning what is most important to them.

Follow her adventure at Bohemian Travelers.

This post is one in a series of articles about Redefining Education. You can read the other posts here:

Why the School System isn’t Educating Your Child (And What To Do About It)

4 Steps to Improve Education in the USA

You Can’t Reform an Education System Based on Oppression

Educating Kids Through Teacher/Student Partnerships

Let’s quit arguing about what’s wrong with schools and man-up as parents

Imagine something better than school

Is our education system built on miracle teachers?

Thinking out loud, outside the box

Learning is the new paradigm of Education

Schools & Jails: What’s the difference?

Education for Today’s Global Economy

Wisdom: Knowledge that has been tempered by experience

How to use parental mentoring as a solution for educational reform

 

Nancy Sathre-Vogel author

About Nancy Sathre-Vogel

After 21 years as a classroom teacher, Nancy Sathre-Vogel finally woke up and realized that life was too short to spend it all with other people's kids. She and her husband quit their jobs and, together with their twin sons, climbed aboard bicycles to see the world. They enjoyed four years cycling as a family - three of them riding from Alaska to Argentina and one exploring the USA and Mexico. Now they back in Idaho, putting down roots, enjoying life at home, and living a different type of adventure. It's a fairly sure bet that you'll find her either writing on her computer or creating fantastical pieces with the beads she's collected all over the world. Test

Connect with us!

We love to get to know new people. Send us a message!

11 Responses to How to improve the public school experience from an unschooler’s perspective

  1. signy April 12, 2012 at 7:57 pm #

    AGREE!!! really appreciate your perspective. thank you! More fascinating words on the need for school change… Seth Godin’s Stop Stealing Dreams: http://www.squidoo.com/stop-stealing-dreams

    [Reply]

    Nancy Reply:

    @signy, Funny you mention that. Stop Stealing Dreams was actually the impetus for this entire series of posts!

    [Reply]

  2. Rachel Denning April 12, 2012 at 9:50 pm #

    Very beautifully presented. Some great ideas!

    [Reply]

  3. Susan Beverley April 23, 2012 at 7:25 am #

    What an astounding common sense article!

    Refreshing in this crazy world.

    Thank you.

    [Reply]

  4. Mike Mahoney April 23, 2012 at 5:45 pm #

    Disagree. The achievement of students in the strict, one room schoolhouse far surpassed that of students, today. Who knows what they want to do at 12? Apprenticeships would waste time required to master the basics and build to advanced academics. No more experimenting with kids’ future. K-8 should strive for strict discipline, rote learning, mastery of the basic three Rs.

    [Reply]

    Nancy Reply:

    @Mike Mahoney, While I totally agree that kids don’t know what they want to do at age 12, I disagree that K-8 should be about rote memory. It needs to be about learning how to learn, thinking creatively and critically, and learning to solve problems with unique, creative solutions. They also need to know the 3 Rs, but that can easily be learned while learning to learn.

    [Reply]

    Mike Mahoney Reply:

    @Nancy,
    Hasn’t it been established that the human brains’ capacity for abstract thought only begins to develop at age 12? Learning how to learn and critical thinking require higher cognitive capabilities than more 12 year and younger kids can muster. When the mastery of the basics is complete, then and only then is the foundation complete for building the next steps. Learning should be a lifetime experience. Why the rush to push a child into a realm before they are capable of truly having comprehension of the concepts?

    [Reply]

    Nancy Reply:

    @Mike Mahoney, No, it absolutely has not been established that kids’ can’t think abstractly until the age of 12. In fact, moving from addition and subtraction to multiplication is a huge leap because of its abstractness – kids can no longer actually put the two groups together to see what htey come up with. And we expect them to do that in third grade at age 8. Division is even more abstract, but we don’t wait until they’re 12 to teach that.

    Learning how to learn involved thinking through the learning process. When I work with my first graders and say, “Hmmm… let’s see. I’ve got 14 + 21. I would solve that by saying 14 is really ten and four and 21 is really twenty and one. So if I add the ten and twenty I get thirty and the 4 and 1 I get five. When I put them all together I get 35. Did anybody do it a different way?”

    And then one of my kids says, “I started with 21 and then added the ten to get 31 then added four more to get 35.”

    That’s helping kids figure out their thought process and helping them learn how to learn. We do it with babies all the time.

  5. Mary April 23, 2012 at 10:27 pm #

    I completely agree with your assessment of my article…if we want to churn out robots or soldiers. Of course 12-year-olds don’t know what they want to do. That’s why they should be exposed to as many different “field” studies as possible starting at that age. You know, going out in the real world to see what may interest them? I hardly think they’ll find their passion in the three “Rs”. I appreciate you taking the time to read and comment on my article.

    [Reply]

  6. Mike Mahoney April 25, 2012 at 2:44 pm #

    My reference: http://montessorimuddle.org/2010/02/15/abstract-thinking-and-brain-development/
    and here:
    http://www.cerebromente.org.br/n12/opiniao/pensamento_i.htm

    Somebody who studies brain development says many of the higher learning functions aren’t ready to go till adolescence, if even the, if at all in some people.

    [Reply]

    Nancy Reply:

    @Mike Mahoney, There are various levels of abstract thinking, as kids grow and mature that thinking gets more complex.

    I remember when my twins were little (think 2 or 3 years old) my husband used to take one of their toys and put it up on the chandelier. The boys had to think of a way to get it down. It was interesting to watch them think together to figure out how to do it. They ended up pushing the couch under the light fixture, then putting an end table on the couch, then a chair on that. With one of the boys holding it all in place, the other one could climb up and retrieve the toy.

    That was very definitely abstract thinking. Granted it wasn’t as abstract as Einstein’s theory of relativity, but abstract nevertheless.

    If we don’t expect kids to think abstractly when they are little (at that level) we can’t expect them to suddenly start thinking creatively and critically at age 12 – it’s a gradual process and each step builds on the foundation built earlier.

    First grade kids are very capable of understanding complex scientific concepts like polarity and form/function. It think it’s a crime that we aren’t teaching them to think in the earlier grades.

    [Reply]

Leave a Reply

.

Let me guess...

You've got a dream you would love to see happen - but you're not quite sure how to get there. We can help.

 

email addresses are never sold or shared with anyone!